 |
| English: A "Golden False Acacia" in the Swiss Garden at Old Warden. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The sociological approach for philosophical progress
in the world differs a lot from just reading or lecturing about the books of philosophy
and that of education in general. That seems the major reason that when we
praise someone in the west or the modern world for any work done, it may seem
trying to prove that one is this or that for praising the westerner or modern
person. If I praise Carol Roach, it may seem that I am after something, but for
this entire process of acknowledging the great contribution, we in east use
rich words like yogi, rishi, pundit, and so many other names.
However, while
considering its worth in the modern context we may simply call them great
contributors. While working on the contribution of the past and present and
that of the ancient and the modern, I worked on a research work that I gave a
name of Philselfology acknowledging knowledge of east in the western context. It
embraces the human knowledge and wisdom by the level of insight that one has
rather than the qualification or the degrees, and thus we can award a degree of
masters, doctorate and or any other even to an illiterate person. The focus of
it has been on the quality of experience rather quantity of it.
If the quality
is high, the contribution is high otherwise, one struggles to prove as a leader
or a contributor without any significant achievement. It has nothing to do with
what one knows but what one can do without any training and or education. This
is the philosophical level of an individual and my concern always have been
from my research works about the proper process of acquiring this level without
getting confused with the knowledge and or what one knows. In other words, if
one knows 1% with more than 50% of insight, one is master in that thing.
The
master of knowledge and Jade of nothing does not seem to have any significance
when we analyze any human philosophically. We seem to have gone too academic
and seem to swim in the ocean of knowledge without accepting that the fish
needs only a pond of water to live. The level of experience that one feels is a
total chaos, and what we seem to do is to assess it without any respect for human
intellect and consciousness. It does not have any parameter as it is too
personal and we cannot apply any local to universal laws but feelings of respect,
the reverence, and the feelings of shame (here shame in India is the human shame
that we call Lajja or never trying to harm anything with any possible means and
or tools.
That is why carol Roach, James Ferrel and Steven Ferrel are genius
philselfologically. All are philselfological great contributors as one who
lives, gives, and being genius does not mean more than being able to contribute
more. Therefore, we salute to all contributors in any human and living form. This
is thus a philselfological process and one can read more about it here:
Thanks for your time for reading Art of Sacred Visualization, the Darshan - Carol Roach as a Visualizer and Contributor: Part 2 as if serving and working for the Wisdom Tree!
Copyright by Dr. Harmander Singh-Protected and archived by World_Wide_OCR_dot_com Seal (TM) File, Canada
No comments:
Post a Comment